Watch
jeanvieve for the most current updates, but he just went into surgery. Turns out he has a bad strep infection in his leg, but it's not staph. They're going to drain icky things out. His mother and Kurt are there with him and will send details once he's out of surgery.
[I posted this as a comment in
red6count's journal, but wanted to post it here, too, because it's something I've been thinking about while I've been researching a project.]
I'm currently reading England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings 1075-1225 by Robert Bartlett. It's a wonderful book, that describes in detail life in the twelfth century in England, based on historical sources. What Bartlett has to say about court life is this:
"The description of Hugh of Avranches, earl of Chester (d. 1101), given by Orderic Vitalis, exemplifies the hedonistic, materialistic, athletic, public, and noisy nature of the great aristocratic household:
'He loved the world and wordly pomp and thought that they were the highest blessing that human beings could attain. He was always the first in battle, lavish in his giving, took great pleasure in games and luxuries, in actors, horses, dogs and other vanities of this kind. He was surrounded by a huge household, in which there were crowds of boys, both nobles and commonors, making a great noise, as well as honourable clerks and knights with whom he shared his labours and his wealth.'
... Feasting, hunting, joking, love, gifts -- that is the ideal picture of the aristocratic court." [p. 235]
For those of you complaining that the Spartans* care only about fighting and partying, and that artisans are ignored, I have this to say: Congratulations. The SCA has successful recreated the Middle Ages.
* An SCA household known for its members' emphasis on armored combat and partying. Due the former interest, members of this group tend to frequently win Crown tournaments and reign as King and Queen.
I'm currently reading England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings 1075-1225 by Robert Bartlett. It's a wonderful book, that describes in detail life in the twelfth century in England, based on historical sources. What Bartlett has to say about court life is this:
"The description of Hugh of Avranches, earl of Chester (d. 1101), given by Orderic Vitalis, exemplifies the hedonistic, materialistic, athletic, public, and noisy nature of the great aristocratic household:
'He loved the world and wordly pomp and thought that they were the highest blessing that human beings could attain. He was always the first in battle, lavish in his giving, took great pleasure in games and luxuries, in actors, horses, dogs and other vanities of this kind. He was surrounded by a huge household, in which there were crowds of boys, both nobles and commonors, making a great noise, as well as honourable clerks and knights with whom he shared his labours and his wealth.'
... Feasting, hunting, joking, love, gifts -- that is the ideal picture of the aristocratic court." [p. 235]
For those of you complaining that the Spartans* care only about fighting and partying, and that artisans are ignored, I have this to say: Congratulations. The SCA has successful recreated the Middle Ages.
* An SCA household known for its members' emphasis on armored combat and partying. Due the former interest, members of this group tend to frequently win Crown tournaments and reign as King and Queen.
Yesterday, or possibly today, marks twenty years that I've been living in the Bay Area.
Interesting article on the Celts (or should I say, the "Celts") in Clarkesworld:
http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/maund_0 6_09/
http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/maund_0
Happy birthday,
fearless_em!
Or should I say, Dr.
fearless_em? For those of you who haven't met Sarah (Teresa's niece), you can read all about the crystal salamanders she discovered in Yellowstone National Park while doing her doctoral research, here:
http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/20 09/03/yellowstone-national-park-home-wol ves-grizzlies-elk-moose-and-crystal-sala manders
http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/20
I went to see "Wicked!" in SF with
hrf,
scotica, and
duchessletitia this evening. I knew nothing about the play beyond the very basics, and I was very pleased with how it went. I won't give anything away because of spoilers, but it was very clever. The costuming and sets had a very steampunk flavor, with actual gears appearing here and there. I recommend seeing it for those of you who haven't made it yet.
visited 39 states (78%)
Create your own visited map of The United States or Best time to visit Namibia
I finished the Lymond Chronicles last night and loved it. However, I keep thinking that the whole series is really just Star Trek fanfic. Think about it. Lymond is a Mary Sue if I've ever read one:
1. His hair is a different, more beautiful color than everyone else's.
2. His eyes are a different, more beautiful color than everyone else's.
3. He's the smartest.
4. He's the best fighter.
5. He's the best musician.
6. Everyone loves him or hates him, but he's really just misunderstood.
7. He always has the wittiest things to say.
Also, there's more hurt/comfort in these books than in "Spock Enslaved!" And the slash subtext between Lymond and Jerott just drips from the page. The Turks are the Romulans, the Russians are the Klingons, Queen Mary's court are Vulcans (not the nice kind). Lymond has his bridge crew that follow him around everyone. The whole thing just screams Star Trek.
1. His hair is a different, more beautiful color than everyone else's.
2. His eyes are a different, more beautiful color than everyone else's.
3. He's the smartest.
4. He's the best fighter.
5. He's the best musician.
6. Everyone loves him or hates him, but he's really just misunderstood.
7. He always has the wittiest things to say.
Also, there's more hurt/comfort in these books than in "Spock Enslaved!" And the slash subtext between Lymond and Jerott just drips from the page. The Turks are the Romulans, the Russians are the Klingons, Queen Mary's court are Vulcans (not the nice kind). Lymond has his bridge crew that follow him around everyone. The whole thing just screams Star Trek.
I went to aikido last night for the first time since early February. Since I had worked from home, I was able to go to class from the beginning, so I got warmup time plus the beginner techniques before moving to the advanced techniques later in the class. I was rusty, but overall fine. I still can't bend my left knee all the way without lots of stretching in advance, but that will come. All in all, even though I quit a little bit early, it was OK.
This morning, everything hurt. My back, my butt, my legs, my neck, my shoulders -- everything but my knee. :-)
This morning, everything hurt. My back, my butt, my legs, my neck, my shoulders -- everything but my knee. :-)
I'm in the middle of reading two books, both of which I'm enjoying quite a bit, and I'm fascinated by the way the two books are similar yet very, very different. Both of them are romances, though I wouldn't say either of them are part of the modern genre "romance," but keep in mind I hardly ever read any genre romances so I'm certainly not an expert. [Note that I haven't finished either of these books yet, so if you have please don't tell me spoilers on the endings. I do have spoilers for the first five Lymond chronicles, though.]
The first book, my current night time reading, is What Love Means to You People, by NancyKay Shapiro. I picked this up a couple of years ago based solely on the fact that NancyKay was a college friend of mine. This is the first of her serious writing that I've read, though I loved a long-running fan fiction romance she kept up in college, about The Who and the Beatles. What Love Means to You People is the story of two gay men, Seth, a young artist who is living in New York City and just scraping by, and Jim, a successful businessman about twenty years older who is still grieving for his lost partner.
The second book is my commute paperback, Checkmate, by Dorothy Dunnett, the last of the Lymond Chronicles. This one more than the others focuses on the relationship between Francis Crawford of Lymond and his wife Philippa, who is ten years younger and married him at his suggestion in order to save her honor when they were forced to spend the night in the same bedroom at a Turkish harem. (Long story. Five books worth of it.) Their marriage has not been consummated, and Lymond is trying to do the right thing by obtaining a divorce, though this is hampered by the laws and politics of sixteenth century Europe, where this is set.
What I find so interesting is that both of these are romances, though the Dunnett one is high romance, and both are concerned with love, sex, and secrets, yet they handle them so differently and so similarly at the same time. In both cases there is an age difference, which is an initial cause for concern in the pairs. In NancyKay's novel, which deals with gay men, there is a period of quite some time while the men simply date without sex, as the older Jim comes to terms with his grief over his dead lover and the guilt about moving on. Lymond, on the other hand, initially (two books back) thinks of Philippa as merely a child, because she is, but over the course of the books she has become quite an accomplished young woman, trained as she has been in the Turkish harem as well as later at the court of Queen Mary of England ("Bloody Mary"). What is more interesting to me, though, are how love and sex are handled. In Renaissance Europe, honor and politics take the lead over love (because of course Lymond is nobility in just about every country he shows up in, being, as a true romantic hero, a better warrior than everyone else in history, as well as more handsome, smarter, and wittier -- and of course more tortured). Both Lymond and Philippa torture themselves in order to do the right thing for everyone else, pushing away their own desire for who they love. Also, even though Lymond is quite the slut, the point is made repeatedly about Philippa's purity. Not so with Jim and Seth. Once they get together there are quite a few good (and graphic, without being silly) sex scenes. I'm not sure that love has even been mentioned between the two of them yet, but sex is an important part, and an early part, of their relationship.
Most of the last couple of books in the Lymond series have had a strong subplot about secrets surrounding Lymond's birth, with both Lymond and Philippa separately seeking answers. In the modern novel, Seth also has secrets he has not told Jim. It looks so far like these secrets will prove to be an important factor in the characters' relationships, though I don't know yet (and don't tell me). I'm looking forward to finding out, and I'm enjoying comparing the two tortured romances, one written forty years ago about a time five hundred years ago, and one written much more recently. I recommend both books.
The first book, my current night time reading, is What Love Means to You People, by NancyKay Shapiro. I picked this up a couple of years ago based solely on the fact that NancyKay was a college friend of mine. This is the first of her serious writing that I've read, though I loved a long-running fan fiction romance she kept up in college, about The Who and the Beatles. What Love Means to You People is the story of two gay men, Seth, a young artist who is living in New York City and just scraping by, and Jim, a successful businessman about twenty years older who is still grieving for his lost partner.
The second book is my commute paperback, Checkmate, by Dorothy Dunnett, the last of the Lymond Chronicles. This one more than the others focuses on the relationship between Francis Crawford of Lymond and his wife Philippa, who is ten years younger and married him at his suggestion in order to save her honor when they were forced to spend the night in the same bedroom at a Turkish harem. (Long story. Five books worth of it.) Their marriage has not been consummated, and Lymond is trying to do the right thing by obtaining a divorce, though this is hampered by the laws and politics of sixteenth century Europe, where this is set.
What I find so interesting is that both of these are romances, though the Dunnett one is high romance, and both are concerned with love, sex, and secrets, yet they handle them so differently and so similarly at the same time. In both cases there is an age difference, which is an initial cause for concern in the pairs. In NancyKay's novel, which deals with gay men, there is a period of quite some time while the men simply date without sex, as the older Jim comes to terms with his grief over his dead lover and the guilt about moving on. Lymond, on the other hand, initially (two books back) thinks of Philippa as merely a child, because she is, but over the course of the books she has become quite an accomplished young woman, trained as she has been in the Turkish harem as well as later at the court of Queen Mary of England ("Bloody Mary"). What is more interesting to me, though, are how love and sex are handled. In Renaissance Europe, honor and politics take the lead over love (because of course Lymond is nobility in just about every country he shows up in, being, as a true romantic hero, a better warrior than everyone else in history, as well as more handsome, smarter, and wittier -- and of course more tortured). Both Lymond and Philippa torture themselves in order to do the right thing for everyone else, pushing away their own desire for who they love. Also, even though Lymond is quite the slut, the point is made repeatedly about Philippa's purity. Not so with Jim and Seth. Once they get together there are quite a few good (and graphic, without being silly) sex scenes. I'm not sure that love has even been mentioned between the two of them yet, but sex is an important part, and an early part, of their relationship.
Most of the last couple of books in the Lymond series have had a strong subplot about secrets surrounding Lymond's birth, with both Lymond and Philippa separately seeking answers. In the modern novel, Seth also has secrets he has not told Jim. It looks so far like these secrets will prove to be an important factor in the characters' relationships, though I don't know yet (and don't tell me). I'm looking forward to finding out, and I'm enjoying comparing the two tortured romances, one written forty years ago about a time five hundred years ago, and one written much more recently. I recommend both books.
I've been reading Henry of Huntingdon's History of the English People 1000 - 1154, which he wrote in the twelfth century. The first part of the book is based on earlier sources, and has some of the most interesting turns of phrase I've read in a while. The first part of the book chronicles the Danes attacking England, and mixed in with everyday comments are these horribly gruesome events, such as "Wherever they passed they ate joyfully what had been prepared, and when they departed they made payment for their keep by murdering their host and setting fire to their lodging-place." The beginning of the eleventh century seemed to be a time where the Danes came and burned and pillaged, and, like the sagas various people have been talking about here on LJ, people have betrayed and murdered their friends.
I've enjoyed the similes he uses based on nature. My life has so little in it of the natural world right now, dealing as it does with computers and trains and television, that I enjoy reading what someone without anything like that does with the language. A couple of my favorites are:
"In the year 1003 the Danes were inflamed with a justifiable anger, like a fire which someone had tried to extinguish with fat. So flying down like a swarm of locusts, [they burned and pillaged]."
"...with [Swein] were always associated his three companions -- plunder, burning, and killing -- and all England lamented and shook like a reed bed struck by the quivering west wind."
I've also found my current favorite name, AElfweard, which I'm sure must be pronounced elf-weird. It just has to be.
I've enjoyed the similes he uses based on nature. My life has so little in it of the natural world right now, dealing as it does with computers and trains and television, that I enjoy reading what someone without anything like that does with the language. A couple of my favorites are:
"In the year 1003 the Danes were inflamed with a justifiable anger, like a fire which someone had tried to extinguish with fat. So flying down like a swarm of locusts, [they burned and pillaged]."
"...with [Swein] were always associated his three companions -- plunder, burning, and killing -- and all England lamented and shook like a reed bed struck by the quivering west wind."
I've also found my current favorite name, AElfweard, which I'm sure must be pronounced elf-weird. It just has to be.
Or Benjamin is, anyway. Happy birthday to the best little brother ever!
- Mood:
pleased
Happy birthday
alcapini and
albionwood!
OK, it may be cheating to combine these, since your birthdays are a day apart, but have a great weekend and lovely birthdays!
I will help you find your dream.
A real knight, that is. My mother has been out visiting my aunt and her new husband, who is a very distant relative of ours. My aunt and new uncle met because they were both doing genealogical research on our family. My mother found out from them that my great-grandmother's branch of the family is descended from a knight from the Alsace-Lorraine. When he was knighted he changed the family name to Von Zorn ("from the Zorn river", which is a river that runs into the Rhine in Alsace). He and his immediate descendants owned some castles, too, though only one is still standing. My branch of the family came over to South Carolina in 1735, and at some point started calling themselves just Zorn. Pretty cool.
I've been waiting for this to come out for ages, and even though the latest Asimov's has a review of it, Amazon still doesn't show it for sale. Being the resourceful person that I am, I ordered it directly from Night Shade Books, where it shows as being available. Since I know some of you out there have been impatiently waiting for this, too, I suggest you order it directly from the publisher, too.
http://nightshadebooks.com/cart.php?m=p roduct_detail&p=112
http://nightshadebooks.com/cart.php?m=p
- Mood:
aggravated
Below the cut are pictures of
acanthusleaf in her Girl Genius dress, and me in my new dress that I wore to a wedding today.
( pretty dresses )
( pretty dresses )
